<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Indy.com: &quot;Sports News&quot; by bjohnson</title>
    <link>http://www.indy.com/posts/5441</link>
    <description></description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <item>
      <title>JL Kato</title>
      <author>JL Kato</author>
      <description>Well, not actually. It was called Cubs Park, then renamed Wrigley Field sometime in the 1920s when the Wrigley family bought the team. It was named in honor of William Wrigley, though how you separate the man from the company I don't know.

What I wonder is, which naming sponsor would risk the wrath of Cubs fans who in all likelihood would insist on calling it &quot;Wrigley&quot;?
And wouldn't it be a hoot if a rival brand did buy the naming rights.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 16:57:31 -0500</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.indy.com/posts/5441#comment_15564</link>
      <guid>http://www.indy.com/posts/5441#comment_15564</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
