<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Indy.com: &quot;Pundit Police Watch News Talkers 24/7&quot; by The Associated Press</title>
    <link>http://www.indy.com/posts/5022</link>
    <description></description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <item>
      <title>IndyCurmudgeon</title>
      <author>IndyCurmudgeon</author>
      <description>I doubt there would not be anything that the Clinton's would not pimp out to win this thing.  I may have to pack up and move to Canada is she gets elected.  I am astonished that few have mentioned the absurdity of her claiming to be the 'change candidate&quot; when she would be nothing more than a Clinton redux.  

Two family's (Bush's &amp;amp; Clinton's) have owned the White House for the last 20 years, so relected another one is Change?  

At this point, I will vote for almost anyone but her.

Cheers!</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2008 22:05:56 -0500</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.indy.com/posts/5022#comment_14494</link>
      <guid>http://www.indy.com/posts/5022#comment_14494</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>JLucas</title>
      <author>JLucas</author>
      <description>The Clinton campaign IS pimping out Chelsea. Might as well say it.</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2008 18:31:31 -0500</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.indy.com/posts/5022#comment_14478</link>
      <guid>http://www.indy.com/posts/5022#comment_14478</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
