<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Indy.com: "Heigl slams "Knocked Up"?" by joe.shearer</title>
    <link>http://www.indy.com/posts/2391</link>
    <description></description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <item>
      <title>Christopher Lloyd</title>
      <author>Christopher Lloyd</author>
      <description>I don't think either gender comes off particularly well in this flick...

The only character who was 100% likable was Harold Ramis as Seth's dad.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 12:12:29 -0500</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.indy.com/posts/2391#comment_8275</link>
      <guid>http://www.indy.com/posts/2391#comment_8275</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>jslicer</title>
      <author>jslicer</author>
      <description>Saying that "Knocked Up" portrays all women as humorless shrews suggests that the film portrays all men as immature, stoner slackers.

I'm a woman, and I found the film absolutely hilarious.  I saw it twice while it was in theaters.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 12:07:14 -0500</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.indy.com/posts/2391#comment_8272</link>
      <guid>http://www.indy.com/posts/2391#comment_8272</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Channing</title>
      <author>Channing</author>
      <description>I think her career peaked with 'Under Siege 2.' It's all been downhill since then.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 03:00:33 -0500</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.indy.com/posts/2391#comment_7643</link>
      <guid>http://www.indy.com/posts/2391#comment_7643</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>DigitalEvolution</title>
      <author>DigitalEvolution</author>
      <description>i must be sphmoric cause i thought that knocked up ans superbad were hilarious!</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 16:10:24 -0500</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.indy.com/posts/2391#comment_7561</link>
      <guid>http://www.indy.com/posts/2391#comment_7561</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>joe.shearer</title>
      <author>joe.shearer</author>
      <description>Well, I'm assuming she is including Leslie Mann's character as well, who was a little shrewish, but still, they were both relatively good characters. They had motives behind what they did, and they were both nice people at the core. They weren't just bitchy for the sake of being a shrew, and they both also came across as sensitive, caring women. 

The fantasy baseball scene was a good character moment for Mann's character. It wasn't that she hated that he was having fun, it was that she couldn't understand why he needed to be away from her, but at the same time she needs that time away too, but didn't really know it. 

The best thing to me is that with both Mann and Paul Rudd and with Rogen and Heigl, both characters were right and both were wrong in most of their arguments. Like Rudd's character said, their biggest argument is that she loves him too much.

The film was about people growing up and learning to live happily within that most unnatural act of living with another person (and raising children).</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 13:28:44 -0500</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.indy.com/posts/2391#comment_7537</link>
      <guid>http://www.indy.com/posts/2391#comment_7537</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>indyclone</title>
      <author>indyclone</author>
      <description>I must have missed it where the movie said that her character was a representative of all women... or that Rogen's was for all men... IMO she's the bitch... not her character..</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 13:03:39 -0500</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.indy.com/posts/2391#comment_7534</link>
      <guid>http://www.indy.com/posts/2391#comment_7534</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Garin</title>
      <author>Garin</author>
      <description>and you waited a good while!</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 12:57:08 -0500</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.indy.com/posts/2391#comment_7531</link>
      <guid>http://www.indy.com/posts/2391#comment_7531</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>theGuru</title>
      <author>theGuru</author>
      <description>I agree with Lila. With all they hype, I think I just expected so much more from this film.  I really didn't find it funny.  Maybe there was one or two scenes I felt I actually laughed, but I couldn't wait for the movie to be over.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 12:25:49 -0500</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.indy.com/posts/2391#comment_7528</link>
      <guid>http://www.indy.com/posts/2391#comment_7528</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Garin</title>
      <author>Garin</author>
      <description>it just wasn't long enough!</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 09:07:07 -0500</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.indy.com/posts/2391#comment_7499</link>
      <guid>http://www.indy.com/posts/2391#comment_7499</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Lila</title>
      <author>Lila</author>
      <description>Call me humorless, but I didn't find that film to be all that funny. Seemed sort of sophomoric to me, though I'll admit to laughing out loud when the friend walked into the delivery room and saw a few things he wasn't expecting. Just my 2 cents. </description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 09:04:20 -0500</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.indy.com/posts/2391#comment_7498</link>
      <guid>http://www.indy.com/posts/2391#comment_7498</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>BMack</title>
      <author>BMack</author>
      <description>I agree.  The few times I've seen her speak in interviews or read about her, she's come across as being a bit "bitchy" herself.  That's not going to get you far in that industry if you start burning bridges early. </description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 23:21:22 -0500</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.indy.com/posts/2391#comment_7485</link>
      <guid>http://www.indy.com/posts/2391#comment_7485</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
