Header_posts

Scaremongering or Art?

caralyn
by caralyn

Log In to rate this post

(2 Results)

35777
Radical Art Collective, Ztohoven's latest work.

According to a story here in the IHT, a collective of Czech artists are facing up to three years in jail, or a fine, or both, charged with scaremongering and attempted scaremongering.

Apparently a few months ago, of an early Sunday morning; the artists, who go by the collective moniker "Ztohoven" patched their way into the local cable and blasted what originally was a small, sleepy, breakfasting viewing audience with a faux nuclear blast smack in the middle of the morning news. And, while there was no "War of the Worlds" fall out, half a dozen members of Ztohoven, whose identities remain a mystery, are being charged with the crime of scaremongering.

Yup. an actual crime. Merriam Webster defines a scaremonger as "one inclined to raise or excite alarms especially needlessly".

The stunt is nothing new to the group known for its radical, activist art including, among other things, tinkering with a giant neon sculpture of a heart at the top of Prague Castle. And, it seems, that by and large the Czech public had lukewarm response to the event. And, perhaps this is not so surprising for a group which sees its artistic roots couched in a culture and a history that is known for appreciating sly mystery and deadpan humor. The stunt highlights a particular history in Czech culture of "tomfoolery" (not my word choice...several articles mention it!) and members of Ztohoven were quick to point to a larger cultural relevance in their art. The National Gallery in Prague last month even awarded the group a prize. the Gallery's director explained that the award was not a statement about the pending court case, but had instead been given for the group's "directness" in use of "Media Reality" as an emerging art form.

The "blast" itself grew in notoriety more after post-event coverage and YouTube dissemination see it here than anything else. (sidebar - everyone pop in your earbuds and turn up the volume. Dig the elevator music during the explosion)

And, while the stunt occurred across the globe and stories are just now leaking into local press it seems a relevant theme on a more local level as well.. While Ztohoven's art/stunt was more methodically planned and larger scale than, say, your average graffiti on a bill board or tagging of a public wall, the underlying theme is the same: Artists trying to shock a portion of the viewing public out of their every-day stupor. Should they be charged for a crime? Check out the links I'd be curious to know what you guys think

Follow this thread (RSS)

caralyn

Some additional info can be found at artnewsblog.com at nytimes.com and at artthreat.net

enjoy!

caralyn on Jan 29, '08 at 10:24 AM
Braden

From artnewsblog: "The hoax called "Media Reality" was liked by the Czech National Gallery as the group received prize money of $18,000 for the work. Hopefully they haven't spent their winnings though as it will now be needed to try and keep them out of prison."

It's interesting that artists revered the work while public office had condemned it. Very interesting indeed.

Even more interesting: There was no public fall out. So who did they hurt or 'scaremonger' again?

Also From Wikipedia regarding 1984 (for what it's worth): "There is controversy about whether people panicked in the streets, and a series of urban legends have grown up around the production which suggest that major disturbances took place."

Braden on Jan 30, '08 at 10:37 AM
caralyn

Right! But the group's attorney was quoted as saying that the public's lack of fear was not the explanation for the charge of "attempted" scaremongering. (The charge is a Czech legal fine point.) So how does one qualify an attempt and how is that different from actually mongering a scare???

caralyn on Jan 30, '08 at 10:42 AM
Braden
caralyn wrote:
Right! But the group's attorney was quoted as saying that the public's lack of fear ...

Okay, try to follow me on this one ...

I propose that the Czech government is the real scaremongerers (love using that word). If they are punishing them for an 'attempt', I surmise that they're doing it to curb any future attempts at something like this that may result in more outcry. With me? If that's the case, then they're scaremongering the artists by making an example of them.

Braden on Jan 30, '08 at 10:53 AM
ronlewhorn

Absolutely! Right on Braden! I love what they did. good times.

ronlewhorn on Jan 30, '08 at 10:56 AM
caralyn

Additionally, I propose that we attempt to use "scaremongering" in a sentence at least twice today...go...

Although i do wonder if/doubt that the government's prosecution of the artists will do anything to lessen the severity or number of future attempts. Seems like governmental oppression would only spur additional radical action. Which should be a good show considering their past work!

caralyn on Jan 30, '08 at 11:02 AM
Log In or register to leave a comment
Flash appears here