Today:
Posted: Jan 17, 2008 in Movies
Tags:
Monster film looks and sounds 'real'
Despite the presence of mind-twisting, building-tall monsters, "Cloverfield" is the most intimate, familiar monster movie ever made. So far.
Through a storytelling combination of found media and Sept. 11 echoes, "Cloverfield" may well herald a wave of films that rely on the blending of the fantastic and the recognizable. But for now, director Matt Reeves' film is its own creation, a twitchy thrill ride that is relentless in its escalation of tension, merciless in its intensity.
And a heck of a lot of fun.
"Cloverfield" owes an obvious debt to both "Godzilla" and "The Blair Witch Project." Like the former, it's a full-on monster movie, with a giant creature terrorizing a city (in this case, New York). Like the latter, a dose of Dramamine before watching wouldn't hurt, as the entire film is told through the lens of a hand-held video camera.
If you can stomach it, that's one of "Cloverfield's" great strengths. It never once drops the conceit that we are seeing the story through the lens of the camera with which Hud (T.J. Miller) was filming testimonials at a going-away party for his best friend, Rob (Michael Stahl-David), before all hell broke loose.
Through clever use of the camera -- and, in a brilliant touch, some footage that gets partially taped over -- "Cloverfield" also manages a little character development, like Rob's relationship with Beth (Odette Yustman), whom he will spend much of the movie trying to save.
Hud, Rob and Rob's brother, Jason (Mike Vogel), are taking a break from the party when massive explosions -- and ominous footstep-like thuds -- begin to rock the buildings.
If it looks like something you've seen before, it is. Some of the scenes, in particular one in which people scurry into a store while massive debris clouds roll past, are direct lifts from news footage of the Sept. 11 attacks.
But familiar scenes are what make the film so effective, and so scary. "Godzilla" was a cold-war nightmare, but "Cloverfield" is at times a real-life nightmare relived. We don't have to imagine the reaction to senseless terror. After 9/11, we know what it looks like.
While everything is seen through Hud's camera, it shows us the monster on a cable-news network on a store's television and overhears the cell phone message that sends Rob into action.
It's all there, on tape. More and more, this is the way we tell stories, the way we perceive truth. "Cloverfield" captures that experience and uses it in the way all good monster movies do -- by taking the familiar and twisting it, until it scares the pants off us.
- By Bill Goodykoontz / Gannett News Service
Cast: Michael Stahl-David, T.J. Miller.
Running time: 90 minutes.
Rating: PG-13; violence, terror and disturbing images.
Spoiler - I AM the monster in this movie - though it's not revealed until the very end.
OK, I made that up. I just wanted your attention. I'm very needy.
lol it was NOT godzilla. Definitely not.
Anyone out there who saw the movie and got motion sickness? I heard from someone who saw it and said they warned people beforehand and place extra trashcans in the theatres.
I know it's shot in shaky cam, like Blair Wich, which made me hurl.
It was a little shaky, but not as bad as Blair Witch, IMO. There were long stretches where it leveled out, but it was definitely there. It doesn't bother me, to be honest, but if you have a problem with that sort of thing, I suggest if you see it in theaters to sit toward the back! Or BYOBarfBag
If you have seen Blair Witch and Godzilla(New or Old) you can feel fine about missing this one... unless you need another dose.
If you have seen Blair Witch and Godzilla(New or Old) you can feel fine about ...
I have to say I wholeheartedly disagree with that statement. To the keen eye, "Cloverfield" offers so much more. It's hardly a rehash, and it has plenty of room for additional goodness. See the other "Cloverfield" post...mine for details.
I have to say I wholeheartedly disagree with that statement. To the keen eye, "Cloverfield" ...
Well, I feel being an "average" movie goer... I felt bored by the movie, found the charters slightly annoying. Just another monster movie shot with a shaky camera. Other movies I wish I had my time back for include several of the academy award nominees. I go to movies to be entertained and shut my brain down for a while. Many movies that critics are hyping over I feel are a waist... 2 1/2 stars I feel was about right for the movie if not generous.
I am not easily amused.