Today:
Posted: Nov 19, 2007 in Movies
Tags:
Well, that motion-capture animation has certainly made strides since "The Polar Express."
Beowulf, for the most part, looks amazing.
The dragon fight at the end of the film was breathtaking, and writers Neil Gaman and Roger Avary did a pretty good job adapting the story for the big screen, inconsistencies from the source aside.
Interestingly enough, it's Beowulf whose character is technically flawed, as, among the main characters Anthony Hopkins' and Angelina Jolie's are very photorealistic. It's Beowulf and John Malkovich's Unferth who look the most plastic, though that changes from scene to scene.
Grendel (Crispin Glover) is a truly disturbing character who is given quite a bit of pathos as a simple, pained soul who is manipulated by his mother (Jolie).
I was a little surprised to see people bringing their younger children to see this. There was quite a bit of (virtual) nudity (and a little suggestive language) and lots of gore (though much of it is done in quick-cut style or realized as we see shadows of what's happening).
But this is certainly a film worth seeing. Check it out on the big screen.
Disagree. Thumbs down. Sorry mate.
Disagree with the disagreement. Did you see it in 3-D? If I had seen the regular version I would have been disappointed. The IMAX and 3-D made it worth the time and money. I'd see it again.
Quite a few youngster in the theater when I saw it (like 7-8 years old). Scenes with dripping intestines don't make the best viewing for kids (but I enjoyed it).
Fun in 3-D (but what isn't?)