RE: Another film critic bites the dust
Coverage decisions in newspapers are based on what the readers want. The same is true for what's screened at movie theaters. It's all about demand. If I think Key should be running only silent films because that's what I like best, Ron will most likely say that's not what his audience wants. So he'll say no. He might screen a silent film here and there. He might not. Nobody but me will complain if he doesn't. The same is true for newspapers (which I no longer work for, by the way). They have to go where the audience is because newspapers are a business not a public entity. And I know the audience for short-run independent films is pretty small because I'm part of it. And I can also find reviews of those films online very easily. So I don't need or look to the Star for this kind of arts coverage. I never have. Also, you can look at it this way: I'm part of a small art gallery in Fountain Square. Should our little, independent and low-budget gallery with a relatively small audience receive the same coverage as the IMA? We don't expect that. So -- instead of griping -- we work harder to promote what we do in other creative ways and see any media coverage as gravy.

0 comments