posts

Gonzo: The Life and Work of Hunter S. Thompson

Jenny  Elig
by Jenny Elig

Posted: Jul 23, 2008 in Movies

Tags: documentary, Hunter S. Thompson

Log In to rate this post

(0 Results)

120296
Between rages: Hunter S. Thompson strikes a calm pose in "Gonzo: The Life and Work of Dr. Hunter S. Thompson." (AP Photo/Magnolia Pictures)
120295
In this undated image provided by Magnolia Pictures, Hunter S. Thompson is shown in a promotional photo from the film, "Gonzo: The Life and Work of Dr. Hunter S. Thompson." (AP Photo/Magnolia Pictures)

"Gonzo: The Life and Work of Dr. Hunter S. Thompson," the documentary about the journalist of the same name, is kind of depressing. Not because the famous writer and inventor of gonzo journalism shot himself with a .44-caliber gun in 2005. Not because the suicidal despair to which he succumbed was apparently caused by the condition of the United States today.

No, "Gonzo" is depressing because in showing life in the 1960s and 1970s -- the life that Thompson gleefully covered -- it gives us a good shot of exactly what lame, complacent phonies we are today.

Thompson, born in 1937 in Louisville, Ky., is one of the truly larger-than-life characters in the annals of American history. He got his start by copying F. Scott Fitzgerald's "The Great Gatsby" word for word.

Thompson caught the public eye and came into his own when he immersed himself in the outlaw motorcycle gang, Hell's Angels. From there, he covered political campaigns (and held a portion of the responsibility for making and breaking some of the candidates) and ran for sheriff of Pitkin County, Colo., on the Freak Power Party Ticket.

"Gonzo," directed by Alex Gibney and starring a slew of politicians (Jimmy Carter, George McGovern and a jovial Pat Buchanan), real-life movie stars (Johnny Depp reads some of Thompson's words; Jimmy Buffett talks about his relationship with the journalist) and Thompson himself (in archival footage), serves as a visual eulogy for the writer.

That's apropos, considering the film ends with footage of Thompson's 2005 funeral, when a 150-foot cannon, shaped in the writer's two-thumbed fist logo, shot off his ashes during a ceremony of explosions and celebrities (Depp, Sean Penn and Lyle Lovett were in attendance). Gibney obviously likes his subject; although this is a warts-and-all documentary, Thompson probably gets off a little lightly.

His first wife, Sandra Thompson, had to call a sheriff when she announced that she needed a divorce. When a deputy arrived and asked if Hunter had any guns, Sandra replied, "Yes, 22 of them, and every one is loaded."

The film winds down a little abruptly, and some of the unproductive, post-divorce, gong-shooting later days are skimmed over.

But Gibney's coverage of Thompson's heyday, the Haight-Ashbury scene and the rebelliousness of the 1960s on the West Coast, are lovingly dealt with.

Gibney splices in scenes from Terry Gilliam's film adaptation of "Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas" and actual footage from Thompson and Oscar Acosta's search for the American Dream -- and its death in Las Vegas.

Thompson emerges as a sort of hero on the campaign trail (when he produced "Fear and Loathing: On the Campaign Trail") and finds himself becoming more of a star than his subjects.

"Gonzo" is a celebration of a man for whom things never got weird enough. It's a celebration of baby boomer culture and, for those who choose to emulate it, blueprints. No one will accuse this documentary of shaking our political climate or cultural scene out of the boring wasteland that they have become, but at least "Gonzo" gives audiences pause to remember how things were, and how one man chose to remember them.

Follow this thread (RSS)

Nate

who do you think portrayed Mr Thompson better on the screen? Johnny Depp or Bill Murray?

I would probably say Depp had the better material to work with, and therefore had a better performance, but Murray had a lot of fun with the character, and put in a great performance too.

Nate on Jul 29, '08 at 11:31 AM
rasputin

I'm certain that being depressed is the last thing the filmmakers would want the audience to feel after seeing this documentary, not that this is supposed to be a feel-good movie. It's also not a nostalgic film, which is kind of implied here, and the film is definitely not what I would call a celebration of baby boomer culture, since that was the very thing Thompson rallied against and often despised. Much of Thompson's work was about looking at the dark side of capitalism, politics, and American culture, but the destination in mind was not just to bum you out, but to get you to think and question. Hunter Thompson never made any concessions for pedestrian readers, and neither does this movie for anyone unequipped to deal with some complex ideas.

Another pretty strange point that's worth bringing up is the description of today's politics as "boring." The last eight years under this current administration have been one disaster after another, yet I wouldn't characterize them as boring. To me, that's real complacency.

rasputin on Jul 29, '08 at 11:43 AM
Jenny  Elig

We don't have people running on Freak Party tickets. We might need to take any political discussions out of this forum :)

I did see a strong stripe of nostalgia in this film. It wasn't total sentimental tripe, but the tinge of Boomer love was all over. I'll be going to see it again tonight, and maybe my opinion will change, but maybe we agree to disagree on this one. Thank you for reading!

Jenny Elig on Jul 29, '08 at 11:48 AM
Chris Vannoy
Jenny Elig wrote:
We don't have people running on Freak Party tickets. We might need to take any ...

Is it playing locally?

Chris Vannoy on Jul 29, '08 at 01:44 PM
Chris Vannoy
Chris Vannoy wrote:
Is it playing locally?
Chris Vannoy on Jul 29, '08 at 01:47 PM
Log In or register to leave a comment

A better job awaits

Enter occupation keywords:
Flash appears here